![]() |
Fall 2006 |
This seminar meets every Friday in the SFSU Mathematics Department (in Thornton Hall 211--directions to campus). For further information, please contact the seminar organizers (Federico Ardila, Matthias Beck, Joseph Gubeladze, and Serkan Hosten).
| Meeting dates: |
|
|
|
|
3:10 p.m.
John McCleary
Vassar College
| The Square-Peg Problem |
| Given a Jordan curve in the plane, are there four points lying on the curve that form a square? The talk will recount how I got into this problem, some solutions with conditions, and how my co-authors (Jason Cantarella and Elizabeth Denne) are approaching the full case, which is still unknown. |
3:10 p.m.
Cindy Traub
MSRI
| Topology and the Minimum Weight Triangulation Problem |
| Topological and algorithmic techniques are useful in the study of problems in combinatorics, discrete geometry, and computational complexity. We combine aspects of these fields in a study of the minimum weight triangulation problem for planar point sets. In particular, we investigate how minimum weight triangulations are affected by the addition of points. Let mwt(X) denote the weight (i.e., the sum of the edge lengths) of a minimum weight triangulation of a finite point set X in R2. The conditions are studied under which an n-point set X will allow an (n+1)st point p (called a Steiner point) to give mwt(X union {p}) < mwt(X). Such a p is called a Steiner reducing point, and the collection of all such Steiner reducing points is called the Steiner reducing set of X, denoted St(X). We prove that these Steiner reducing sets can have complicated topology: they may have many connected components or may fail to be simply connected. |
3:10 p.m.
Winfried Bruns
Universität Osnabrück
| On the coefficients of Hilbert quasi-polynomials |
| Abstract |
3:10 p.m.
Josephine Yu
University of California, Berkeley
| The Newton Polytope of the Implicit Equation |
| We apply tropical geometry to study the image of a map defined by Laurent polynomials with generic coefficients. The tropicalization of an algebraic variety is a polyhedral fan, and we give a combinatorial description of this fan for a parametrized variety without computing the defining ideal. If this image is a hypersurface then our approach gives a construction of the Newton polytope of the defining polynomial. |
3:10 p.m.
Michael Joswig
Technische Universität Darmstadt
| Products of foldable triangulations |
| Regular triangulations of products of lattice polytopes are constructed with the additional property that the dual graphs of the triangulations are bipartite. The (weighted) size difference of this bipartition is a lower bound for the number of real roots of certain sparse polynomial systems by recent results of Soprunova and Sottile [Adv. Math. 204(1):116-151, 2006]. Special attention is paid to the cube case. This is joint work with Nikolaus Witte (TU Berlin). |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
3:10 p.m.
Carsten Schultz
Technische Universität Berlin
3:10 p.m.
Sam Payne
Stanford University
| Ehrhart series and lattice triangulations |
| I will discuss combinatorial formulas for counting lattice points in polytopes using lattice triangulations. These formulas are inspired by calculations from stringy algebraic geometry, and lead to examples of reflexive polytopes whose Ehrhart series have unexpected properties. |
3:10 p.m.
Eva-Maria Feichtner
Universität Stuttgart
| Tropical Discriminants |
|
We use tropical geometry to take a fresh look at the theory of
A-discriminants of Gelfand, Kapranov and Zelevinsky. We show that
the tropical A-discriminant is the Minkowski sum of the row space of
A and the Bergman fan of the kernel of A. The latter is a
well-studied object in geometric combinatorics. As our main
application, we present a positive formula for the extreme monomials
of the A-discriminant, regardless of any smoothness assumption.
This is joint work with Alicia Dickenstein and Bernd Sturmfels. |
3:10 p.m.
Dominic Hughes
Stanford University
| Proofs are Graph Homomorphisms |
|
"Mathematicians care no more for logic
than logicians for mathematics."
(de Morgan, 1868)
The dry syntactic manipulations of formal logic can be repellant to mathematicians. This talk presents a syntax-free formulation of propositional logic in which proofs are combinatorial rather than syntactic, recasting propositional logic as a branch of graph theory. It defines a combinatorial proof of a proposition P as a graph homomorphism h : C -> G(P) where G(P) is a graph associated with P, and C is a colored graph. The talk summarises a paper which just appeared in Annals of Mathematics. The talk should be accessible to a broad mathematical audience. In particular, it will not presume any background in propositional logic. |
![]() |
Department of Mathematics 1600 Holloway Ave San Francisco, CA 94132 (415) 338-2251 |